Failure of the Current Design: Chicago's Paucity of Parks.    (1/2)  Slide 2 of 11.
Twin Embraces (c) 2020-2021, Grahm Balkany: Architect.  All Rights reserved.   www.OPCWashPark.US

Twin Embraces (c) 2020-2021, Grahm Balkany: Architect. All Rights reserved. www.OPCWashPark.US

Above:  Chicago has less public park space per capita than any of the 22 other major U.S. cities surveyed

The City of Chicago has less public park space per capita than any of 23 representative major cities across the United States (chart ).  To make matters worse, recent studies have shown that tree canopy coverage in Chicago’s disadvantaged communities has been decreasing rapidly over the last 10 years (further reading is linked below).  The impacts of this devastating loss are most pronounced on the South and West Sides, paralleling and exacerbating longstanding disparities between Chicago’s privileged and less fortunate areas.

Negative impacts stemming from limited access to parks and nature are well documented.  These include greater risk for respiratory conditions such as asthma, reduced physical fitness, and degradation of mental health.  Reduction of mature trees and parks also is well known to hurt property values, bringing a direct economic disadvantage to areas that already suffer from stigmatization and disinvestment.

The neighborhoods with the lowest canopy are on the south and west sides, some with less than 10 percent coverage, while neighborhoods with the highest canopy tend to be to the north of the city, with Forest Glen - 46% tree canopy - at the top of the list.
-- ABC Channel 7 News  



Further Reading

Tree Disparity
Chicago's Declining Urban Tree Canopy
General Information on Chicago's Trees